Re: Glass breaks again...

["Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The Caddx problem was due to the fact that Caddx was
not made to report 4x2 format. If you use CID, it works fine.
But when you programmed the panel for 4x2 it did strange stuff.
At the time we used 4x2 exclusively, and that was pointed
out when we bought the product.

ESL did not notify the users, they notified the vendors.
If we had not called direct to the manufacturer we
would never had known. And ADI, after knowing about
the recall, wasn't sure what we should do.

Norm Mugford


"Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dMSdnVy9W_0-ye3fRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > "Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:6LPbe.103572$f%4.59231@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> I had the same problem ... invalid signals
> >> coming from NX6 & NX8 panels.
> >
> > In almost 10 years I've yet to see an invalid
> > signal from a Caddx panel unless someone
> > screwed up the zone reporting code..
>
> Are you implying that our own vice chair of the Florida ECLB might
actually
> have screwed up the programming on a panel???  Perish the thought... :^)
>
> > I could see not dealing with ADI again but
> > why ESL? They did notify about the recall
>
> True, but their smokes probably cost him at least $0.10 more than System
> Sensor and you know how important a dime is when you're always replacing
all
> kinds of panels with something you know.
>
>