Re: how many lies can you find in this post?

["Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>]

You seem somewhat confused, you are now replying to comments I made to RLB,
not to you. I certainly never said you have any animosity towards me, and
I'm not quite sure where you come up with the absurd idea that I have made
threats to you, RLB, CHA or anyone else for that matter.

I made a single comment to you, that in my opinion you are wrong to tar
everyone with the same brush, you disagree, that's fine, so why do you now
want to make more of it than is necessary ?.

You should probably re read the thread and take your own advice
 I.E. "stop trying to make yourself more important that the situation
dictates. As in "get over yourself".."



Doug

--

"Bill Kearney" <wkearney-99@hot-mail-com> wrote in message
news:QuednW43Gs_f3jvYnZ2dnUVZ_uyknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:NRPoh.22757$X97.19602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> If that's the case then you will have no problem pointing out the posts
>> in
>> CHA where I have tried to destroy this group. Obviously you can't because
>> they don't exist other than in your imagination. You seem to think that
>> if
>> you repeat the same tired lies about me often enough that they will
>> become
>> facts, they won't, you may get a few or even a lot of people to believe
> you,
>> but that's not the same thing.
>
> No, more like your own posts will let the readers draw the same opinion.
>
>> Its clear from your response to my post to Bill  that you harbour
>> personal
>> animosity towards me, despite the fact that my post made no mention of
> you.
>
> I could honestly care less about you and certainly don't have any personal
> animosities toward you as a person.  So stop trying to make yourself more
> important that the situation dictates.
>
> As in "get over yourself".
>
>> My advice to you is to either ignore me, or at least leave out the
> personal
>> slurs and I will return the favour, there is no reason for us to become
>> involved in a pissing match in this group.
>
> What, threats now?  And this helps c.h.a, how?
>