Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

["alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>]

tourman wrote:
> On Jun 24, 10:09 am, Frank Olson
> <use_the_email_li...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> tourman wrote:
>>> On Jun 24, 3:05 am, "Doug" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> RHC: Doug, could I ask you please not to repost. I don't want to
>>> have to filter other legitimate posters to avoid rants from this
>>> disturbed sicko.
>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>> You may not like Jim's posting style.  Heck...  even I think it's
>> "over the top" on occasion.  What Jim had to say was equally as
>> "legitimate" as you.  It was "on topic" and contained nothing the
>> least bit derogatory.  If Doug hadn't reposted it, I certainly would
>> have.  A number of us happen to disagree with your business model.
>> I understand it and I respect you for it.  It's not something a
>> company with ten plus employees and related overheads can emulate
>> (and still stay in business).  It works for you because you've
>> managed to control the size of your enterprise and cap your
>> overheads.  Good on you.
>
> RHC: Frank, it has nothing to do with the legitimacy or not of what he
> says. Nor does it have anything to do with whether we disagree
> philosophically about business - we've long ago chewed that one to
> death !  I simply choose not to see direct replies to me from this
> individual. I grin and bear it when he posts hate filled responses to
> other posters, or simply in most cases, choose not to even read these
> indirect posts. I am not suggesting you censor his posts based on
> whether or not the content is "on topic" or "derogatory" - simply
> don't repost his DIRECT replies to my posts in order to bypass my
> filters. That serves no purpose other than to simply bypass my
> filters.
>
> If you follow your logic, you are implying you would repost everything
> other than the hateful posts ! I would take issue with that myself on
> the basis of censorship and freedom of speech!  But these are direct
> responses to me - nothing more. I have chosen not to see them. There
> is a huge difference there......

Hey, don't read it. That simple...remember?

--
js

Cut the RED wire. No...wait!