Re: Brinks Home Security Fraud

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jun 24, 1:20=EF=BF=BDpm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> RHC: Frank, it has nothing to do with the legitimacy or not of what he
> says. Nor does it have anything to do with whether we disagree
> philosophically about business - we've long ago chewed that one to
> death ! =EF=BF=BDI simply choose not to see direct replies to me from thi=
s
> individual. I grin and bear it when he posts hate filled responses to
> other posters, or simply in most cases, choose not to even read these
> indirect posts. I am not suggesting you censor his posts based on
> whether or not the content is "on topic" or "derogatory" - simply
> don't repost his DIRECT replies to my posts in order to bypass my
> filters. That serves no purpose other than to simply bypass my
> filters.
>
> If you follow your logic, you are implying you would repost everything
> other than the hateful posts ! I would take issue with that myself on
> the basis of censorship and freedom of speech! =EF=BF=BDBut these are dir=
ect
> responses to me - nothing more. I have chosen not to see them. There
> is a huge difference there


If no one reposted it, and I really wanted to send it to you, I'd just
assume another screen name, identify myself to you in the text and
send it.