Re: 707 Roll.

["I brive a dus" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>]

Frank Olson wrote:
> I brive a dus wrote:
>
> > Do you smoke crack? If we all got along this place would be boring.
>
> Be that as it may...  It would become what Steve Ryckman envisioned all
> along.  That's not a bad thing and something I will continue to advocate
> for.<

Frank, I've read some of Steve Ryckman's posts. While he seems like a
very intelligent man he's about as entertaining as slugs fucking. His
newsgroup dream has been realized over in that automation group. Those
geeks love to talk about jellywatts, jigawatts, megawatts, resistors,
remote control dildos, and all other kinds of techie nerdy crap.

> > Nah no way was it Mike. It was done by a cowardly pussy. A fag hiding
> > behind an alias trying to stir up trouble. Mike? No way.
>
> I could post the Google that proves it.  The poster that claimed to be
> "Mike" confessed to being "Mike" more than once (in unrelated threads).<

So then post the PROOF that it was Mike.

> > Well you're saying I'm not as honest as I used to be so I was sharing
> > some past claims.
>
> Which is something Bass will never do.<

And if he did what would that accomplish?

> > Do we have enough bandwidth?
>
> Apparently.  People post binaries, html, catalogue sheets, and other
> useless garbage into here all the time.<

What's useless to you is entertaining to others.
I personally enjoyed Jack's posting of the Youtube burglar vids.

> > How do you know what he expects,
>
> That's pretty obvious.<

Is it?

> > and when was the last time I turned
> > the other cheek?
>
> I don't recall.  What you did here (to restore "balance" between you and
> Bass) didn't involve a "turning of the cheek".  How long this will last
> is very much up to Bass as well.<

Ummm Frank, last time I was the one who broke the peace. I believe it
was somewhere around 2001 or 2002.  We had another decent flame fest
that lasted about 3 years and then it started getting old again.

> > Robert and I are not pals but that doesn't mean I'm agreeing with all
> > the bullshit being tossed around.
>
> OK.
>
>
>
> > Involved in what, Frank? There's really nothing left to fight with him
> > on unless he comes out with another wild keypad story or you come out
> > with another floating ladder story.
>
> There are two distinct differences between the examples you've decided
> to concentrate on.  The "wild keypad story" is definitely a lie.  The
> "floating ladder story" has been "elevated" by Robert's rather futile
> attempts to discredit me.  You can't believe everything he posts
> particularly when it involves anything to do with his time in the trade,
> the things he's seen (or done), the professionals that post here (that
> don't happen to agree with his antics), professional monitoring and
> installation, etc.  If you do, then I have this really unique business
> opportunity you might be interested in.  It involves a bridge over the
> Fraser River and a toll booth.<

The years in the business thing is better than lotto but Frank that
ladder story was a whopper. Shame the devil and tell the truth

> > Don't you understand that you two are so fucking lame right now people
> > are actually hoping Paul starts posting more often?
>
> If you call asking for proof "lame", then so be it.<

Bigtime lame. It's like kids saying "oh yeah" Yeah "oh yeah" Yeah

> > RHC, Bob LaLonde, and Jack spend their free time dry humping
> > motorcycles and fishing poles. You think they will give up any of that
> > time to participate in the same old shit?
>
> Nope.  And they never have "participated".  I respect that.<

Campbell's too fucking old to put up a decent fight.
Bob LaLonde doesn't discuss anything that doesn't involve gills or a
kickstand, and Jack is looking tired from reading the same shit being
posted with nobody backing up their nonsense.

> >>>Did Robert publically confirm that he contributed? Yes. Did you expect
> >>>him to email me after 8 years of hostility?
> >>
> >>He could have picked up the phone.<
> >
> >
> > He should have called me? LOL Now THAT would have been funny.
> > When you donate money do you call the organization when they send the
> > Thank You card and say "you're welcome"?
>
> Why did Robert feel the need to "publicly confirm that he contributed"?
>   The answer is as obvious as the nose on your son's face.  How is the
> little guy by the way?<

He's doing great. He has about 58,000 teeth, and that nose needs a
tissue every few minutes. How's the grandson? Have you helped the
parents out yet or are you being a dick and enjoying watching them
suffer sleepless nights?
Now why did Robert feel the need to publically confirm that he
contributed? I don't know. Why don't you ask him?

> > Well I publically invited assistance but the recipients had no clue
> > where it came from.
>
> And if I wasn't so involved in providing the same service to the
> "recipients" here, you would have received an anonymous money order with
> a "Vancouver" postmark.  We should each of us do what we can to help
> those less fortunate than ourselves.  The need in BC is every bit as
> important.  The Provincial Government (in their infinite stupidity) shut
> down two major long term mental care facilities and hundreds of people
> were left in the lurch.  With no one to supervise the dispensing of
> their required medication, many have gravitated to the streets and all
> the things that entails.  The situation is becoming untenable and the
> stresses imposed on our emergency medical services as a consequence is
> becoming critical.  You can't talk to anyone "in Government".  They're
> all focused on the 2010 Olympic Games and spending billions of taxpayer
> dollars to make things "look nice" for the world.<

Frank I have no doubt whatsoever that you are heavily involved in
charitable works.
I was going to email you BUT you never answer your emails (hrmmm sounds
familiar).
I was going to suggest you save the wire scraps from all jobs this year
and use the cash from junking them to fund an event up north.

> > Not too often will you find a security dealer magazine, or business
> > journal at a shelter or church so the articles on our food drive were
> > pretty safe.
>
> ???<

God damn Canadian pay attention! I was saying that the trade mags
covered my food drive but since the only people reading it are in the
industry it couldn't be viewed as advertising.

> > If you don't like his behavior (no U) then hang out in the automation
> > group with the techie weenie geeks. He seems well behaved there (for
> > now- seems a brawl is on the horizon there too).
>
> Yep.  That's what I've been dreading as well.  It seems he has "issues"
> with one particular poster there that I have a great deal of respect
> for.  It seems he's become Bass' latest "target".<

There's a cranky old son of a bitch who posts in there that looks to be
the next in line for the flame fest.  He was a pain in the ass when he
posted here years back and judging from his latest exchanges he's still
an egomaniacal dickwad.
It should be an interesting hoopdeedoo when people start choosing
sides. They won't be able to blame ASA for their turmoil.

> > He's not changing. You're not changing. I'm not changing.
>
> Aux contraire, mon ami.  Things would "change" rapidly if he backed off
> and comes clean.  I realize that's not going to happen.  It would give
> too much "ammo" to his major detractors particularly as he can't keep
> his yap shut for long (as has often been demonstrated in the past).<

Nothing will ever change.

> > You expect him to post proof, and he expects you to post your real
> > name.
>
> Nope.  I don't expect anything of the sort.  He can't "post proof"
> because he has none.  He LIES.  He's good with Italian suppositories.
> And he's expert at deceiving people.  And I don't think he "expects" me
> to post my real name, either.<

What's the big deal with the anonymous antics anyway Frank?
Aside from it burning his ass that you are Johnny Mystery what's the
reasoning?

> > Anyone see my lightning rod?
> > OK making absurd claims about someone isn't lying when used during a
> > newsgroup battle. It's just a gentle relocation of facts with a twist
> > of assumptions.
>
> It's dishonest.  Deceitful.  A lie.  I won't go there.  I'll leave that
> to "Mike" and his ilk.<

Again you're taking a swipe at Mike for no reason. From what I've read
in the group Mike isn't in the best of health. It seems he had a stroke
sometime back and has limited use of one of his arms. I also read about
it on a website where family members request prayers for ailing
relatives. Rather than attack the poor guy why not just say a prayer
for him?

> > New material Frank! Get some.
>
> <sigh><

Sy Sperling

> > I'm no advocate for peace but there's only so many times I can watch
> > the same episode of a show without reaching for the remote to change
> > the channel.
>
>
> Then change the channel.  Unless Bass has stolen the batteries for your
> remote...  Gasp!!  I think I just came up with some "new material"...  :-) <

I am too stupid to use a remote. I still use that bulb on/off switch
attached to the cord.