Re: 707 Roll.

[Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I brive a dus wrote:

>
> Why would I referee something I'd pay to see?


:-)



> To quote Rodney (King not Brittain) Can't we all just get along?

I've been advocating that for years.



> And I accused him of the same. The links posted concerning my business
> was done by someone trying to be a wiseass. Did you see Mike's name
> attached to it? Why would you accuse Mike of trying to fuck with me?

It was definitely "Mike".  You know it, I know it, and so does everyone
else that's a regular participant.  If what Bass says about the numerous
calls to his suppliers from "some guy named Olson", I wouldn't put it
past Mike to use my name to do exactly that.  I've spoken to Robert
about this too.  Ask him how he responded.



> Was I being honest when I said Philly cops questioned him for child
> molestation?

Of course not.  What has that got to do with what I said.


> Don't throw my name into your spat and claim I am not being totally
> honest just because I'm not jumping on the played out record bandwagon.

My apologies.


> Honesty is when you accurately tell all sides of the story and not just
> the side that benefits you the most.

I agree.


> You just tell me when you want me to start being brutally honest about
> everything here.

You can start now.



> I don't forget either but I do dismiss incidents.

I tried that too.  It doesn't work.  Bass expects you're going to ignore
his lies, innuendo and outright attacks on others in this Group.  To
stand idly by while he spins his malicious web of deceit.  If that's the
"respect" you want from him, then by all means you're welcome to it.  I
respect your decision not to get involved just as I respect Bob C.,
Stevens, La Londe, and others.  The source of the flames is well known
to both of us and that fact has been demonstrated on many occasions when
he's been away from the Group for some time.  It's within *his* power to
moderate the responses he gets here.



> Did Robert publically confirm that he contributed? Yes. Did you expect
> him to email me after 8 years of hostility?

He could have picked up the phone.


> Does ADT do the same shit?

I don't agree with it.


> Yes. Do you hold charitable events where they are billed as "Sponsored
> by Frank's company"?

Nope.  We contribute anonymously.  I won't mention the charity but it's
responsible for feeding hundreds of the homeless and downtrodden every
day (and not just Christmas or Thanksgiving).


> Do others here do that too?

Probably.


> Do I care? No. All I
> cared about was making the contributions stretch as far as possible.
> Do you think the kids he helped feed gave a shit about his post or do
> you think they were more concerned with having a full belly?

Of course not.  It's his behaviour in this Group that concerns me.  Bass
can be a nasty piece of shit.  A wolf in sheep's clothing is still a wolf.


> I bet they
> didn't care who was pink as long as it wasn't the bird.

:-)



> Respect doesn't mean admiration. The Yankees and Red Sox hate each
> other but they do respect each other.

I tell you what.  I respect you.  After all the shit Bass has pulled
over the years it's going to take a lot for me to be able to demonstrate
"respect" to him.  I've made the first move two years ago and have
limited my responses to asking for proof for the things he says about me
and others.  I've not personally attacked him in other Groups unless
he's thrown the first stone.  Let's see if Bass is "man enough" to put
away the rocks.  Let's see if he's "man enough" to admit he's lied.


>
> Can you please find some new material rather than using me as the
> vehicle to rehash the ancient shit?

"New material" would require my "inventing" something about him.  That
would be dishonest and a lie.  I've never lied in this Group.