Re: 707 Roll.

["Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>]

--

"I brive a dus" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1169442321.260453.216190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Frank Olson wrote:
>> I brive a dus wrote:
>>
>> > Do you smoke crack? If we all got along this place would be boring.
>>
>> Be that as it may...  It would become what Steve Ryckman envisioned all
>> along.  That's not a bad thing and something I will continue to advocate
>> for.<
>
> Frank, I've read some of Steve Ryckman's posts. While he seems like a
> very intelligent man he's about as entertaining as slugs fucking. His
> newsgroup dream has been realized over in that automation group. Those
> geeks love to talk about jellywatts, jigawatts, megawatts, resistors,
> remote control dildos, and all other kinds of techie nerdy crap.
>
>> > Nah no way was it Mike. It was done by a cowardly pussy. A fag hiding
>> > behind an alias trying to stir up trouble. Mike? No way.
>>
>> I could post the Google that proves it.  The poster that claimed to be
>> "Mike" confessed to being "Mike" more than once (in unrelated threads).<
>
> So then post the PROOF that it was Mike.
>
>> > Well you're saying I'm not as honest as I used to be so I was sharing
>> > some past claims.
>>
>> Which is something Bass will never do.<
>
> And if he did what would that accomplish?
>
>> > Do we have enough bandwidth?
>>
>> Apparently.  People post binaries, html, catalogue sheets, and other
>> useless garbage into here all the time.<
>
> What's useless to you is entertaining to others.
> I personally enjoyed Jack's posting of the Youtube burglar vids.
>
>> > How do you know what he expects,
>>
>> That's pretty obvious.<
>
> Is it?
>
>> > and when was the last time I turned
>> > the other cheek?
>>
>> I don't recall.  What you did here (to restore "balance" between you and
>> Bass) didn't involve a "turning of the cheek".  How long this will last
>> is very much up to Bass as well.<
>
> Ummm Frank, last time I was the one who broke the peace. I believe it
> was somewhere around 2001 or 2002.  We had another decent flame fest
> that lasted about 3 years and then it started getting old again.
>
>> > Robert and I are not pals but that doesn't mean I'm agreeing with all
>> > the bullshit being tossed around.
>>
>> OK.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Involved in what, Frank? There's really nothing left to fight with him
>> > on unless he comes out with another wild keypad story or you come out
>> > with another floating ladder story.
>>
>> There are two distinct differences between the examples you've decided
>> to concentrate on.  The "wild keypad story" is definitely a lie.  The
>> "floating ladder story" has been "elevated" by Robert's rather futile
>> attempts to discredit me.  You can't believe everything he posts
>> particularly when it involves anything to do with his time in the trade,
>> the things he's seen (or done), the professionals that post here (that
>> don't happen to agree with his antics), professional monitoring and
>> installation, etc.  If you do, then I have this really unique business
>> opportunity you might be interested in.  It involves a bridge over the
>> Fraser River and a toll booth.<
>
> The years in the business thing is better than lotto but Frank that
> ladder story was a whopper. Shame the devil and tell the truth
>
>> > Don't you understand that you two are so fucking lame right now people
>> > are actually hoping Paul starts posting more often?
>>
>> If you call asking for proof "lame", then so be it.<
>
> Bigtime lame. It's like kids saying "oh yeah" Yeah "oh yeah" Yeah
>
>> > RHC, Bob LaLonde, and Jack spend their free time dry humping
>> > motorcycles and fishing poles. You think they will give up any of that
>> > time to participate in the same old shit?
>>
>> Nope.  And they never have "participated".  I respect that.<
>
> Campbell's too fucking old to put up a decent fight.
> Bob LaLonde doesn't discuss anything that doesn't involve gills or a
> kickstand, and Jack is looking tired from reading the same shit being
> posted with nobody backing up their nonsense.
>
>> >>>Did Robert publically confirm that he contributed? Yes. Did you expect
>> >>>him to email me after 8 years of hostility?
>> >>
>> >>He could have picked up the phone.<
>> >
>> >
>> > He should have called me? LOL Now THAT would have been funny.
>> > When you donate money do you call the organization when they send the
>> > Thank You card and say "you're welcome"?
>>
>> Why did Robert feel the need to "publicly confirm that he contributed"?
>>   The answer is as obvious as the nose on your son's face.  How is the
>> little guy by the way?<
>
> He's doing great. He has about 58,000 teeth, and that nose needs a
> tissue every few minutes. How's the grandson? Have you helped the
> parents out yet or are you being a dick and enjoying watching them
> suffer sleepless nights?
> Now why did Robert feel the need to publically confirm that he
> contributed? I don't know. Why don't you ask him?
>
>> > Well I publically invited assistance but the recipients had no clue
>> > where it came from.
>>
>> And if I wasn't so involved in providing the same service to the
>> "recipients" here, you would have received an anonymous money order with
>> a "Vancouver" postmark.  We should each of us do what we can to help
>> those less fortunate than ourselves.  The need in BC is every bit as
>> important.  The Provincial Government (in their infinite stupidity) shut
>> down two major long term mental care facilities and hundreds of people
>> were left in the lurch.  With no one to supervise the dispensing of
>> their required medication, many have gravitated to the streets and all
>> the things that entails.  The situation is becoming untenable and the
>> stresses imposed on our emergency medical services as a consequence is
>> becoming critical.  You can't talk to anyone "in Government".  They're
>> all focused on the 2010 Olympic Games and spending billions of taxpayer
>> dollars to make things "look nice" for the world.<
>
> Frank I have no doubt whatsoever that you are heavily involved in
> charitable works.
> I was going to email you BUT you never answer your emails (hrmmm sounds
> familiar).
> I was going to suggest you save the wire scraps from all jobs this year
> and use the cash from junking them to fund an event up north.
>
>> > Not too often will you find a security dealer magazine, or business
>> > journal at a shelter or church so the articles on our food drive were
>> > pretty safe.
>>
>> ???<
>
> God damn Canadian pay attention! I was saying that the trade mags
> covered my food drive but since the only people reading it are in the
> industry it couldn't be viewed as advertising.
>
>> > If you don't like his behavior (no U) then hang out in the automation
>> > group with the techie weenie geeks. He seems well behaved there (for
>> > now- seems a brawl is on the horizon there too).
>>
>> Yep.  That's what I've been dreading as well.  It seems he has "issues"
>> with one particular poster there that I have a great deal of respect
>> for.  It seems he's become Bass' latest "target".<
>
> There's a cranky old son of a bitch who posts in there that looks to be
> the next in line for the flame fest.  He was a pain in the ass when he
> posted here years back and judging from his latest exchanges he's still
> an egomaniacal dickwad.
> It should be an interesting hoopdeedoo when people start choosing
> sides. They won't be able to blame ASA for their turmoil.
>
>> > He's not changing. You're not changing. I'm not changing.
>>
>> Aux contraire, mon ami.  Things would "change" rapidly if he backed off
>> and comes clean.  I realize that's not going to happen.  It would give
>> too much "ammo" to his major detractors particularly as he can't keep
>> his yap shut for long (as has often been demonstrated in the past).<
>
> Nothing will ever change.
>
>> > You expect him to post proof, and he expects you to post your real
>> > name.
>>
>> Nope.  I don't expect anything of the sort.  He can't "post proof"
>> because he has none.  He LIES.  He's good with Italian suppositories.
>> And he's expert at deceiving people.  And I don't think he "expects" me
>> to post my real name, either.<
>
> What's the big deal with the anonymous antics anyway Frank?
> Aside from it burning his ass that you are Johnny Mystery what's the
> reasoning?
>
>> > Anyone see my lightning rod?
>> > OK making absurd claims about someone isn't lying when used during a
>> > newsgroup battle. It's just a gentle relocation of facts with a twist
>> > of assumptions.
>>
>> It's dishonest.  Deceitful.  A lie.  I won't go there.  I'll leave that
>> to "Mike" and his ilk.<
>
> Again you're taking a swipe at Mike for no reason. From what I've read
> in the group Mike isn't in the best of health. It seems he had a stroke
> sometime back and has limited use of one of his arms. I also read about
> it on a website where family members request prayers for ailing
> relatives. Rather than attack the poor guy why not just say a prayer
> for him?
>
>> > New material Frank! Get some.
>>
>> <sigh><
>
> Sy Sperling
>
>> > I'm no advocate for peace but there's only so many times I can watch
>> > the same episode of a show without reaching for the remote to change
>> > the channel.
>>
>>
>> Then change the channel.  Unless Bass has stolen the batteries for your
>> remote...  Gasp!!  I think I just came up with some "new material"...
>> :-) <
>
> I am too stupid to use a remote. I still use that bulb on/off switch
> attached to the cord.
>