[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UL trying to get rid of combo panels



"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e7eeefb7-32cb-43ee-80cf-6cb2fd65e5d7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jul 11, 2:02 pm, "Russell Brill" <russwbr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> messagenews:i1152i$3e3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >news:1004710f-e954-48cc-bb9d-ca7f31a6d75d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> On Jul 6, 5:00 pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> On Jul 6, 10:05 am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >>> > "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> >>> >news:ffd75771-8d9b-4f00-be8d-bc46c865806b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >>> > > On Jul 5, 1:20 am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> > >> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> >>> > >>news:19a554c1-4bff-42c5-9d32-3c654faf17b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >>> > >> >> Napco does have a new panel coming out that claims to meet
>> >>> > >> >> all
>> >>> > >> >> the
>> >>> > >> >> latest
>> >>> > >> >> standards. Its finaling at UL, and they have listed it on
>> >>> > >> >> their
>> >>> > >> >> website.
>> >>> > >> >> I
>> >>> > >> >> am on the beta list.
>>
>> >>> > >> > It looks awesome just hope it is cant wait to get my hands on
>> >>> > >> > one
>>
>> >>> > >> Well, I have to say if they have isolated power circuits for
>> >>> > >> burg/fire/access and true two line monitoring it should be set.
>> >>> > >> Now
>> >>> > >> if
>> >>> > >> they
>> >>> > >> could come up with a dual band primary rated cell using GSM
>> >>> > >> *AND*
>> >>> > >> CDMA so
>> >>> > >> it
>> >>> > >> could knock on AES's back door and eliminate the need for phone
>> >>> > >> lines I
>> >>> > >> would be ecstatic.
>>
>> >>> > >> I always thought Caddx would have gone that way if they hadn't
>> >>> > >> sold
>> >>> > >> out.
>> >>> > >> I
>> >>> > >> guess their P&L never caught up with their R&D costs.
>>
>> >>> > > DMP now has a stand alone cell unit UL Fire Comm Knock Knock
>>
>> >>> > Does it meet TWO (2) line requirements?
>>
>> >>> > If not why bother? Uplink and Telular both have single line fire
>> >>> > primary
>> >>> > rated communicators already, and I don't have to promise a first
>> >>> > born
>> >>> > son to
>> >>> > buy from them.
>>
>> >>> I think Honeywell has one as well
>>
>> >> DMP piece is stand alone with out having to use the extra phone line
>>
>> > It meets the requirement for two separate communications paths? Do you
>> > know how it meets that requirement? Does it use and check in on both
>> > GSM
>> > and CDMA every 24hrs? If not how does it meet the requirement? Of
>> > course
>> > even if it does DMP wouldn't sell to me anyway, but I am curious. It
>> > can't be a
>>
>> I wouldn't take the "Not Selling to you" thing personally, they pull that
>> S**T in my area too... FYI: They seem to be taking the low road like a
>> lot
>> of the other manufacturers have by jumping into the Lick & Stick market.
>> Have you seen their new product yet? Take a looks
>> seehttp://dmp.com/XTL...
>> All of the Door-to-Door companies will probably be selling it next
>> summer.
>> So far Bosch hasn't lowered themselves to that level yet, hopefully they
>> never will... Come to think of it, Napco doesn't make a all in one lick &
>> stick system either... It sounds like they (Napco) have been spending the
>> last couple of years designing some new product lines that only Trained
>> PROFESSIONALS can install, hmmm image that :-)
>
> Hmmm, I guess that means just you, me and Bob L.    ;-)

Ummm....  I'm pretty much self taught.  Does that mean I have to turn in my
Napco discount card?





alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home