Re: UL trying to get rid of combo panels

["Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>]

"nick markowitz" <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ffd75771-8d9b-4f00-be8d-bc46c865806b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jul 5, 1:20 am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> news:19a554c1-4bff-42c5-9d32-3c654faf17b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> >> Napco does have a new panel coming out that claims to meet all the
>> >> latest
>> >> standards. Its finaling at UL, and they have listed it on their
>> >> website.
>> >> I
>> >> am on the beta list.
>>
>> > It looks awesome just hope it is cant wait to get my hands on one
>>
>> Well, I have to say if they have isolated power circuits for
>> burg/fire/access and true two line monitoring it should be set. Now if
>> they
>> could come up with a dual band primary rated cell using GSM *AND* CDMA so
>> it
>> could knock on AES's back door and eliminate the need for phone lines I
>> would be ecstatic.
>>
>> I always thought Caddx would have gone that way if they hadn't sold out.
>> I
>> guess their P&L never caught up with their R&D costs.
>
> DMP now has a stand alone cell unit UL Fire Comm   Knock Knock

Does it meet TWO (2) line requirements?

If not why bother?  Uplink and Telular both have single line fire primary
rated communicators already, and I don't have to promise a first born son to
buy from them.