Re: UL trying to get rid of combo panels

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 6, 10:05=A0am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:ffd75771-8d9b-4f00-be8d-bc46c865806b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 1:20 am, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >>news:19a554c1-4bff-42c5-9d32-3c654faf17b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
.
>
> >> >> Napco does have a new panel coming out that claims to meet all the
> >> >> latest
> >> >> standards. Its finaling at UL, and they have listed it on their
> >> >> website.
> >> >> I
> >> >> am on the beta list.
>
> >> > It looks awesome just hope it is cant wait to get my hands on one
>
> >> Well, I have to say if they have isolated power circuits for
> >> burg/fire/access and true two line monitoring it should be set. Now if
> >> they
> >> could come up with a dual band primary rated cell using GSM *AND* CDMA=
 so
> >> it
> >> could knock on AES's back door and eliminate the need for phone lines =
I
> >> would be ecstatic.
>
> >> I always thought Caddx would have gone that way if they hadn't sold ou=
t.
> >> I
> >> guess their P&L never caught up with their R&D costs.
>
> > DMP now has a stand alone cell unit UL Fire Comm =A0 Knock Knock
>
> Does it meet TWO (2) line requirements?
>
> If not why bother? =A0Uplink and Telular both have single line fire prima=
ry
> rated communicators already, and I don't have to promise a first born son=
 to
> buy from them.

I think Honeywell has one as well