Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wEPxi.3468$ze.1219@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Feel free to connect the dots anyway you like.
>> I won't confirm or deny your connections. I
>> don't feel like walking in Jim Rojas' shoes with
>> the Brinks monster. Being right or reasonable
>> isn't going to save the wallet from the legal
>> cashectomy resulting from telling the truth...
>
> I don't blame you at all.  Jim Rojas' situation
> is somewhat different though.  While he is
> morally and ethically in the right, legally he's
> in the wrong.  He has also pretty much sunk
> his own boat by mishandling the matter.  That's
> a real shame since he's a nice guy and doesn't
> deserve what they are doing to him.
>
> The issue with Monitronics isn't so cut and dry.
> If what you say is trye (and I don't doubt you for
> a minute) they would be in a far less advantageous
> position suing you for posting.  Even if it were a
> complete lie like the accusations of Mugford, Olson
> and company, it's an expensive and difficult process
> trying to sue for libel over a Usenet post.  Were it
> not so I'd have taken Mugford down years ago when
> he started his crap.  Olson is a harder target since
> he's not on US soil.  Sabodish would have been
> easy to sue but he had no assets other than a
> dilapidated house in a crappy town.
>
> If you speak the truth about Monitronics' misdeeds
> and have hard evidence to back it up they're not
> likely to fight you over it.  Those are the kind of
> lawsuits that bring major damages and punitive
> awards to someone like you if you can show that
> their suit was intended to stop you from speaking
> the truth.
>
>> I have not identified anyone or any company
>> specifically here...
>
> True, but we know it's Monitronics anyway.  It
> figures someone like Leuck would find a home there.
>
>> People are counting on us. When things break
>> down like this I believe it is a message that
>> everyone should take more into account and
>> recheck everything to be certain nothing in their
>> own house is in out of order...
>
> That's similar to what I've been saying about doing
> daily tests and checking Caller ID.  It is indicative of
> the common mindset unfortunately that some people
> react by defending the status quo rather than trying
> to do anything to make things better.  C'est la merde.
>
>> This is a details business. It means testing, and
>> checking, and second guessing yourself and everyone else up and down the
>> line, as often as
>> you can...
>
> It is for those of us who actually care about quality
> and things like protecting clients.  For some it's just
> a numbers racket -- trying to sign as many customers
> as possible in the shortest amount of time and with
> the least investment in labor and materials.  That is
> why you'll always see people like Leuck arguing
> against anything that costs an extra few pennies per
> account per month instead of promoting better
> practices.
>
>> I learned a lesson here not to allow anyone else
>> to fat finger a panel that you are ultimately responsible for, especially
>> when you cannot quickly
>> verify what was done or not done...
>
> My situation is different from yours since I cater to
> DIYers.  I teach them how to program their own panels,
> explain what the various features are for and how to
> implement them.  On Napco panels I literally walk
> them through the programming, screen-by-screen.  As
> best I can tell, I'm the only online vendor who does
> that as a standard practice.
>
> As to monitoring, there are more differences.  Most
> DIYers don't want monitoring at all or want to DIY that
> as well.  This is their choice.  I give them the names of
> several reliable central station firms that are willing to
> work with DIYers and encourage them to contact one.
> Whichever way they choose to handle it, I still walk
> them through the setup and testing of the system.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>
> =============================>
> Bass Home Electronics
> 941-925-8650
> 4883 Fallcrest Circle
> Sarasota · Florida · 34233
> http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
> =============================>

Mr. BAss wrote:

"Were it not so I'd have taken Mugford down years ago when
 he started his crap".

Did you wipe, after spewing that crap Mr. BAss......

You Lie, You Lie, You Lie......

I'll say it again.....Any time you want to challenge my position,
Go ahead Mr. BAss. You didn't have a leg to stand on when the
State of Florida was at your door for monitoring without a
license, and you don't have a leg to stand on now.

Buy the way Mr. BAss, how much money have you lost since you
had to give up monitoring your DIY accounts? Did the State give
you an ultimatum Mr. BAss?

You Lie Mr. BAss and you have always lied Mr. BAss.....
Same Shit....Different day for you, Mr. BAss.

Knock, Knock......Mr. BAss

Next time, wipe before you spew.

Norm Mugford








I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html