[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Looking to purchase alarm system - suggestions?
Really...didn't know that...did ITI make the reciever...who's =
QuickBridge or is that the name of the model reciever??
"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:PfednREUkeqxtEHfRVn-qQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Yup thats a QuikBridge, it can be used by any alarm panel
|=20
|=20
|=20
| "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:OvOCe.13$Oa2.4318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Yah, I was shocked when Radio Shaft actually had some (a lot actually) =
but
| the price blew me away.
|=20
| You may be right about the reciever as I did not get a low batt at
| all...just 2 pirs & 1 gb & 1 pt went faulted the next day. Didn't =
notice any
| supervisory wiring though. Back when we were installing them I was not =
out
| in the field much like I am now. Its a small white reciever with a led =
in
| the middle and double antennas out the top...didn't mess with it on =
friday.
|=20
|=20
| "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:3sWdnccLyPQ_vEbfRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| |
| | "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| | news:E1FCe.52$5v1.25815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| | I had one yesterday in an old radx 2212 (iti xmtters) using those =
silly
| 1/2
| | AA 3.6 lithiums. Original owner never changed them, never called us, =
then
| | sold the house, new owner didn't want to invest in new batteries on
| | friday...guess what? he got to buy 4 from radio-shaft at 14.95 each =
on
| | saturday. He coulda bought them from me on friday for a lot =
less...but
| | noooooo.
| |
| | Why don't people believe us? I know how long batts are gonna last.
| |
| |
| | I can never find those damn things at Rat Shack, they do sell the 3 =
volt
| | lithiums for Honeywell around here tho, those ITI Techram batteries =
are
| | expensive but unlike most other companies life expectancy =
predictions they
| | really DO last 7 to 8 years.
| |
| | I could be wrong but I think the receiver they made for that 2212 =
was just
| a
| | modified QuikBridge which meant that while the receiver itself =
supervised
| | the sensors for low batteries unless you tied the supervisory output =
to
| | another zone the panel never knew a sensor had a low battery
| |
| |
|=20
|=20
|
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home