Re: Glass breaks again...

["Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Those were flames in the midst of a long war between us.  I apologize for
posting them.

"Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aINce.1174282$Xk.456473@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:TrWdnZILfv-nku7fRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> You can be "vulgar" without swearing.
>>
>> I avoid vulgarity, with or without swearing.
>
> So you don't remember writing this?
>
> "Oh, so you don't like having someone hypothesize about what you may have
> been doing with Ashbury's grand-daughter?  I never said you actually did
> it.
> It would be very hard to prove such a statement anyway since Ashbury would
> have to turn state's evidence against you.  Don't worry, Frank.  Any
> secrets
> you might have are safe with good old Jake.  :^)
>
> Note to the humor-impaired:  I don't really believe those stories about
> Olson and preschool girls.  I'm sure he's OK.  Well...., pretty sure
> anyway.
> |:<("
>
>
>
> Or this:
>
>
>
> "What have military tribunals to do with Olson abusing (or not abusing)
> Ashbury's grand-daughter?  No one suggested that he be tried by the army.
> If he's convicted, let it be a Provincial court.  They know how to handle
> guys like him."
>
>
>
>> It's the tool of those who cannot argue using logic.  That's why you see
>> people like Cracker, MM and Mugford constantly resorting to schoolyard
>> profanity.
>
>
>
> Heh.  When you talk to some people (real conversation) I've noticed many
> swear every second word whether they're angry or not.  I seem to recall
> you do as well (when we spoke on the phone).  Heck, I'm in the trade and
> swearing is common (just not in front of the customer).
>
>
>
>> Mugford picked the fight, continued to post vulgar epithets and outright
>> lies without provocation and finally reached the point where I felt it
>> was appropriate to slam him back.
>
>
>
> It's your *choice* whether-or-not to "slam someone back".  I made the
> choice I wasn't going to flame you any more several months ago regardless
> of what you posted in the group.  I have to be honest in that there were
> several occasions where I had to edit my responses before pressing send
> because you continued to flame and post lies about me.  There are ways to
> respond that don't involve "slamming" the individual back.  You'll also
> feel better for it and that's a fact.
>
>
>
>> I don't give a rat's bunda what seat he has on the ECLB.  I don't have to
>> sit back and allow him to slander me in a public newsgroup without
>> responding.
>
>
>
> "Respond" by all means.  You don't have to get "down in the mud" with them
> though.  Constant references to "MM", "Cracker", "Jiminex" only serve to
> "feed the flames".  Compare your responses to "Group Moderator" in CHA.
>
>
>
>