[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Opinions on backup reporting devices



On Jul 14, 8:42=A0pm, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Because Magic Jack and any other VOIP product uses different methods
> of transmitting the signal that is impossible for alarm manufacturers,
> for example here in the Dallas area I've had great luck with Comcast
> and CID however it flat out won't work with Comcast in Atlanta.

You can't tell me that there is NO WAY that a device can't be designed
that will allow alarm signals to be transmitted over VoIP .... I don't
believe it. Change the format. Change the bandwidth, Change the
frequency, change the pulse width. Use sum check, use WHAT EVER and
get it done. All these mfg's are doing is coming up with their
proprietary methods using 20 year old technology and THEIR primary
purpose is to insure that they are getting a piece of the RMR instead
of trying to fix the problem.





>
> BTW it is possible with AlarmNet's Enterprise IP module and central
> station receiver to transmit without another F..king partner-


That's hard to believe. So let's see .... AlarmNet, who's primary
busines is figureing out how they can create a need for a product that
requires them to retransmitt a signal to my central station, doesn't
charge anything at all, to anyone in the signal path for this? So the
central has to have the appropriate receiver and this module is
universal or only compatable with Hornywell products?


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home