Re: another APX oops moment

["Bob La Londe" <onebikenut@xxxxxxxxx>]

"mleuck" <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3063be76-f143-4d87-be61-a669a79c5e14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sep 8, 3:09 pm, "Bob La Londe" <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "mleuck" <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> news:52e41730-0626-4be2-923e-0c0bb2df0ad5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> > On Sep 8, 11:04 am, "Bob La Londe" <onebike...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >> I have to say the DL software could be more intuitively laid out, but
>> >> it
>> >> does allow you to program all the options and it connects easily.
>>
>> > And is extremely slow if used with a modem, that appears to be more
>> > the fault of the panel than the software.
>>
>> I agree since the bigger panels actually seem to download much faster
>> than
>> the smaller panels.
>
> It's not so much the data transfer itself it's the long wait as the
> software apparently checks the status of the panel before and after
> the transfer.

Yeah, and that seems to take longer with the Windows software than it did
with the DOS software too.