Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>I don't doubt what you say.

Sometimes when you take the cash, instead of an formal admission, you leave
open the possibility of hearing from folks that like to deny the unpleasant
ever happened, despite the apparent magnitude of the issue. Not that this is
in any way similar, but as you know folks like denying things like the
holocaust also to suit their own purposes. I never believed they would
advertise the issue, or ever elaborate much about it, but outright denial is
something I never expected. I need to take whatever is on me for seeing the
cash changing hands, and not doing more from my end to prevent future
occurrences. Doesn't seem like much has happened on their end yet. Hopefully
this will all get resolution next week.
.

"Frank Olson" <Use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l0OEi.143543$rX4.43769@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Roland More wrote:
>> Well Frank I wonder whether or not you enjoy getting calls from a
>> customer who walks into their place of business and sees the aftermath of
>> a break in and wants to know why they weren't notified? After you trace
>> the problem to its source and deal with it, you don't want to find this.
>> This being an arrogant attitude of someone that claims to be not only in
>> the apex of the food chain, but in the know as well, yet continues to
>> challenge you on every detail? Details that those above him have verified
>> and not only signed off on, but paid off as well. Remember I only made a
>> comment, the rest is on him. No worries, it will all be finished soon
>> enough. If you think I am off in the deep end then I can say the deep end
>> is fine for me. It's better than being in deep shit, and having to cut a
>> check to cover it all, don't you think
>
>
> What I think is that what you've apparently exposed is simply "the
> unthinkable".  I don't doubt what you say.  It just boggles the mind.