Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46de0ad6$0$32543$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46dddf4e$0$16464$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:sNDxi.174$ni6.88@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > OK, let's make sure we're all clear on this.  You
> > > say that Monitronics disabled monitoring on all
> > > of the dealer's accounts and didn't even notify
> > > the dealer or the customers?  Monitronics
> > > continued to charge the dealer for monitoring
> > > the alarms even though they were no longer
> > > being monitored?
> >
> > This isn't true
>
> You are simply a fool that hasn't checked his sources. I know you have not
> checked, or you have been lied to. You should shut up and check before you
> make this much worse. In a previous post I have provided you with a name
of
> an independent voice you know personally to check with, if you care to
> bother, to see if you are being lied to.

I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not seen
your post about an independent voice

>
> > > And do I also understand clearly that Monitronics
> > > has a policy of locking out not only the end user
> > > but even the installing dealer from programming
> > > the accounts?
> >
> > Also not true
>
> It's not only true, but policy according the head man. I wonder who is not
> telling the truth? Explain how a dealer would program a proprietary panel
> when he doesn't have the software to be able to remotely program it, and
> doesn't have the dealer code to program it locally either? How is that
done
> exactly? It is a neat trick if it is possible. I really would like to know

Which panel?