[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house



>I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not
seen your post about an independent voice

Don't remember Trixie (a.k.a. Tracy) that may be a How word? After well over
a decade now she may work collecting things. She will be so sad that you
have forgotten about all the Red Bull so quickly.

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46de1358$0$17138$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46de0ad6$0$32543$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:46dddf4e$0$16464$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > "Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:sNDxi.174$ni6.88@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > OK, let's make sure we're all clear on this.  You
> > > > say that Monitronics disabled monitoring on all
> > > > of the dealer's accounts and didn't even notify
> > > > the dealer or the customers?  Monitronics
> > > > continued to charge the dealer for monitoring
> > > > the alarms even though they were no longer
> > > > being monitored?
> > >
> > > This isn't true
> >
> > You are simply a fool that hasn't checked his sources. I know you have
not
> > checked, or you have been lied to. You should shut up and check before
you
> > make this much worse. In a previous post I have provided you with a name
> of
> > an independent voice you know personally to check with, if you care to
> > bother, to see if you are being lied to.
>
> I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not
seen
> your post about an independent voice
>
> >
> > > > And do I also understand clearly that Monitronics
> > > > has a policy of locking out not only the end user
> > > > but even the installing dealer from programming
> > > > the accounts?
> > >
> > > Also not true
> >
> > It's not only true, but policy according the head man. I wonder who is
not
> > telling the truth? Explain how a dealer would program a proprietary
panel
> > when he doesn't have the software to be able to remotely program it, and
> > doesn't have the dealer code to program it locally either? How is that
> done
> > exactly? It is a neat trick if it is possible. I really would like to
know
>
> Which panel?
>
>
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home