Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46dee7ef$0$17145$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not
> seen your post about an independent voice
>
> Don't remember Trixie (a.k.a. Tracy) that may be a How word? After well
over
> a decade now she may work collecting things. She will be so sad that you
> have forgotten about all the Red Bull so quickly.

I think the problem here is that so far you've posted nothing but jibberish,
try being more specific, I don't know any Trixie/Tracy or Howard and I don't
drink Red Bull and have never had anyone send me any. I assume thats what
you are talking about however it's a little hard to tell

If you had said Mountain Dew you'd be getting somewhere



>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46de1358$0$17138$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:46de0ad6$0$32543$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:46dddf4e$0$16464$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > "Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:sNDxi.174$ni6.88@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > OK, let's make sure we're all clear on this.  You
> > > > > say that Monitronics disabled monitoring on all
> > > > > of the dealer's accounts and didn't even notify
> > > > > the dealer or the customers?  Monitronics
> > > > > continued to charge the dealer for monitoring
> > > > > the alarms even though they were no longer
> > > > > being monitored?
> > > >
> > > > This isn't true
> > >
> > > You are simply a fool that hasn't checked his sources. I know you have
> not
> > > checked, or you have been lied to. You should shut up and check before
> you
> > > make this much worse. In a previous post I have provided you with a
name
> > of
> > > an independent voice you know personally to check with, if you care to
> > > bother, to see if you are being lied to.
> >
> > I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not
> seen
> > your post about an independent voice
> >
> > >
> > > > > And do I also understand clearly that Monitronics
> > > > > has a policy of locking out not only the end user
> > > > > but even the installing dealer from programming
> > > > > the accounts?
> > > >
> > > > Also not true
> > >
> > > It's not only true, but policy according the head man. I wonder who is
> not
> > > telling the truth? Explain how a dealer would program a proprietary
> panel
> > > when he doesn't have the software to be able to remotely program it,
and
> > > doesn't have the dealer code to program it locally either? How is that
> > done
> > > exactly? It is a neat trick if it is possible. I really would like to
> know
> >
> > Which panel?
> >
> >
> >
>
>