Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve knows a Tracy Howard? Funny you don't know either one? I forgot you
just push the broom, right? I bet you have special little names for all the
mop head you use, right? Maybe when you stop to clean an office called
something like Dealer Tech Support Special Projects you can take out a new
mop head and and call it Steve. You might have to ask first because there
might already be a Steve there working in that office. Just a guess though.
I wonder what Steve knows about what never happened? Mop heads never talk
back do they?

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46df617a$0$4046$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46dee7ef$0$17145$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not
>> seen your post about an independent voice
>>
>> Don't remember Trixie (a.k.a. Tracy) that may be a How word? After well
> over
>> a decade now she may work collecting things. She will be so sad that you
>> have forgotten about all the Red Bull so quickly.
>
> I think the problem here is that so far you've posted nothing but
> jibberish,
> try being more specific, I don't know any Trixie/Tracy or Howard and I
> don't
> drink Red Bull and have never had anyone send me any. I assume thats what
> you are talking about however it's a little hard to tell
>
> If you had said Mountain Dew you'd be getting somewhere
>
>
>
>>
>> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:46de1358$0$17138$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:46de0ad6$0$32543$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> > > "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > > news:46dddf4e$0$16464$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > >
>> > > > "Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > > > news:sNDxi.174$ni6.88@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > > > OK, let's make sure we're all clear on this.  You
>> > > > > say that Monitronics disabled monitoring on all
>> > > > > of the dealer's accounts and didn't even notify
>> > > > > the dealer or the customers?  Monitronics
>> > > > > continued to charge the dealer for monitoring
>> > > > > the alarms even though they were no longer
>> > > > > being monitored?
>> > > >
>> > > > This isn't true
>> > >
>> > > You are simply a fool that hasn't checked his sources. I know you
>> > > have
>> not
>> > > checked, or you have been lied to. You should shut up and check
>> > > before
>> you
>> > > make this much worse. In a previous post I have provided you with a
> name
>> > of
>> > > an independent voice you know personally to check with, if you care
>> > > to
>> > > bother, to see if you are being lied to.
>> >
>> > I'm a fool? You have yet to be specific on anything so far and I've not
>> seen
>> > your post about an independent voice
>> >
>> > >
>> > > > > And do I also understand clearly that Monitronics
>> > > > > has a policy of locking out not only the end user
>> > > > > but even the installing dealer from programming
>> > > > > the accounts?
>> > > >
>> > > > Also not true
>> > >
>> > > It's not only true, but policy according the head man. I wonder who
>> > > is
>> not
>> > > telling the truth? Explain how a dealer would program a proprietary
>> panel
>> > > when he doesn't have the software to be able to remotely program it,
> and
>> > > doesn't have the dealer code to program it locally either? How is
>> > > that
>> > done
>> > > exactly? It is a neat trick if it is possible. I really would like to
>> know
>> >
>> > Which panel?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>