Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46e45766$0$17132$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >who has nothing to do with our little debate here (Steve) and threaten
his
> >job.
>
> But as usual you suppose without asking. Notwithstanding your opinion of
my
> mental state, does it seem at all rational that I, or anyone for that
> matter, would pick at random some employee to try to fix blame on? How far
> would that get in real life? Out of 500 employees, according to your
count,
> I just settled on the name Steve? Like pin the tail on the donkey? Maybe
> because I didn't like his deep sounding voice on the phone? If he fears
for
> his job, which doesn't seem likely just yet given your comments to date,
> maybe Steve has real reason to fear after all? Maybe this was on his plate
> to do for about 6 months. Maybe this is all documented to a faretheewell
and
> the right folks in HR haven't taken a really good hard look at it just
yet.
> Maybe this otherwise ridiculous and destructive policy of phone number and
> account number removal had its genesis in that office? You suggest I
re-read
> my posts? You might want to finally ask Steve about this and reevaluate
the
> "nothing to do with" stance of yours before you post anything else. You
> mentioned that you kind of taught him everything he knows? Given the
> nightmarish results I seriously doubt you taught him to do everything he's
> doing now. Maybe if Steve suddenly finds his job at risk it would be for
his
> level of performance and judgment, or the lack of it. All this, and your
> response to it, seems to me to be several orders of magnitude beyond just
> stupid. It's noble for you to show concern for your co-worker. Some of
that
> same sentiment from you towards the customer and dealer, the ones that
were
> actually hurt by all this, would be much appreciated at this point. The
> denial phase MUST end for this situation to improve, and that should be
> abundantly clear to even you at this point. Once the spotlight re-focuses
on
> this event, and then if HR decides Steve has to fall on his sword, and you
> along with him, then so be it. Not to worry, given a bright spot like that
> on his resume it should be no problem to find another job in this
industry.
> Everyone I know is really looking hard for a way to hire people that have
a
> proven track record of causing big pay outs to customers over liability
> issues, as well as the folks that can claim to have trained them, which
> should be a big plus for you.

Well then I await your complaint, this should be interesting