Re: LOCKED PANEL

[tourman <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sep 5, 1:04 pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So I guess Crash is relegated to the "trash" companys who go around
> locking the boards on their installations. For shame! For SHAME!

RHC: You're saying that, not me. I have had several discussions with
Crash outside this newsgroup, and have no reason to think anything
like that...
>
> > everyone else is wrong and you're right.

RHC: When I'm wrong, I'll say so. But I'm not wrong when I say it is
unethical to lock a board that does not belong to you, and where the
client has no contractual obligations to you. If you don't see the
logic and the ethics in that, that is your problem. The lawmakers of
at least one US state apparently does (and there may be more !)
>
> Is it any wonder that you and Dead Ass get along so well?

RHC: As a matter of fact, we do. And your name calling,and hate
mongering, and hiding behind aliases like a coward only brands you for
what you are. I was about to take issue with RLB where in a recent
post, he said  that you were the kind of person / company that
typically locks customer owned boards. There is no proof of that;
however, your continuing to defend the practice makes me wonder !!

Instead of blathering on about my supposed hatred of large nationals
and other nonsense, why don't you tell the world what you do with your
panels vis a vis this issue. Then we can judge you properly based on
the facts !!