Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera

[teflon nonstick <teflon1_@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/6/06 19:00, in article qqcA84IXbWpEFwlK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <3iapg.69$5K2.27@fed1read03>, alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
> writes
>> I was referring to the audit trail provided by a card access system, not
>> surveillance.
>> js
>>
>> "Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:wE4m3lGEmLpEFwVQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> In article <OwZog.53$5K2.19@fed1read03>, alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> writes
>>>> I was referring to this
>>>> "You are still making excuses for an intrusive surveillance system which
>>>> reduce the risk unlawful access and theft."
>>>>
>>>> "Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
>>>>
>>>>> in message > In Message-ID: <_C_ng.560$Gv.401@fed1read09> you said
>>>>> "Might
>>>>> also be interresting to know who was there",
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> my attribution and quoting are accurate.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently not.
>>>
>>> See
>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/alt.security.alarms/msg/e76ada3e69ca8ec9>
>
> Surveillance
> ? noun close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal.
>
> Observation
> ? noun 1 the action or process of closely observing or monitoring. 2
> the ability to notice significant details. 3 a comment based on
> something one has seen, heard, or noticed.
>
> monitor
>   ? verb keep under observation, especially so as to regulate, record,
> or control
>
> Maybe you do not consider the "audit trail" to be "closely ...
> monitoring", I do; still you are a top poster.

Most of the content in most of the groups deteriorates to shit.

The bloke wanted to lock his fucking door, but this is what it ends up with
brain damaged wankers giving English lessons.

Get. A. Fucking. Life.