[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera



In article <_C_ng.560$Gv.401@fed1read09>, alarman
<alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> writes
>
>"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:G5b7IxUP1CoEFwps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> You do not need "card access", you already have a combination that should
>> only be known to members*, what you now need is a self closing door which
>> can be easily opened from inside but can only be reopened from outside
>> with the combination.
>
>Until a member props the door open. Might be nice to know about that. Might
>also be interresting to know who was there.

Install ventilation that does not allow people access, and fit a loud
alarm to the door which sounds if it has been left open for more than a
few minutes. You are still making excuses for an intrusive surveillance
system which reduce the risk unlawful access and theft. My proposal
could even reduce your insurance premium. Why are you so insistent that
people should be recorded?
--
Ian             G8ILZ


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home