Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera

["alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

Who are you addressing? I suggested a card acces system, I'm not advocating
recording anything.
js

"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DlI6$tcC3MoEFwIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <_C_ng.560$Gv.401@fed1read09>, alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
> writes
>>
>>"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:G5b7IxUP1CoEFwps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> You do not need "card access", you already have a combination that
>>> should
>>> only be known to members*, what you now need is a self closing door
>>> which
>>> can be easily opened from inside but can only be reopened from outside
>>> with the combination.
>>
>>Until a member props the door open. Might be nice to know about that.
>>Might
>>also be interresting to know who was there.
>
> Install ventilation that does not allow people access, and fit a loud
> alarm to the door which sounds if it has been left open for more than a
> few minutes. You are still making excuses for an intrusive surveillance
> system which reduce the risk unlawful access and theft. My proposal could
> even reduce your insurance premium. Why are you so insistent that people
> should be recorded?
> --
> Ian             G8ILZ