Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera

[Prometheus <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx>]

In article <n0kog.649$Gv.266@fed1read09>, alarman
<alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> writes
>"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:DlI6$tcC3MoEFwIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In article <_C_ng.560$Gv.401@fed1read09>, alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
>> writes
>>>
>>>"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:G5b7IxUP1CoEFwps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> You do not need "card access", you already have a combination that
>>>> should
>>>> only be known to members*, what you now need is a self closing door
>>>> which
>>>> can be easily opened from inside but can only be reopened from outside
>>>> with the combination.
>>>
>>>Until a member props the door open. Might be nice to know about that.
>>>Might
>>>also be interresting to know who was there.
>>
>> Install ventilation that does not allow people access, and fit a loud
>> alarm to the door which sounds if it has been left open for more than a
>> few minutes. You are still making excuses for an intrusive surveillance
>> system which reduce the risk unlawful access and theft. My proposal could
>> even reduce your insurance premium. Why are you so insistent that people
>> should be recorded?
>
>Who are you addressing? I suggested a card acces system, I'm not advocating
>recording anything.
>js
>
In Message-ID: <_C_ng.560$Gv.401@fed1read09> you said "Might also be
interresting to know who was there", my attribution and quoting are
accurate.


--
Ian             G8ILZ