Re: How does one find employees, including trainees?

["Tommy" <tommy at leesecurity dot net>]

I still disagree, continuity is "0" resistance to current flow. it does
that by putins voltage on the line and seeing if it has current at the
other lead, if that isn't ohm's law, what is? as it happens i
understand quite well how and why a "volt-ohm" meter works so let me
say this back to you, "Since you obviously don't understand what
"feedback" your
> continuity tester is giving, you clearly don't understand the
> instrument itself.  Whether you actually happen to know Ohm's law or
> not is irrelavent."

As for the snipe, i'm really not trying to be harsh, but you have tried
to give the impression that doing this job is ".... where monkeys can
be trained to do a better job
than some "professionals." quote by RLB.


--



Robert L Bass wrote:

> > I would have to disagree. checking continuity
> > is a perfect use of ohm's law...
>
> You happen to be quite wrong.  Ohm's law derives either resistance,
> voltage or amperage when the other two elements are given.  A
> continuity tester doesn't read voltage or amperage.  Some display
> resistance but that alone is insufficient to determine the other
> values.
>
> > just because you aren't plugging numbers into
> > a calculator dosen't mean you aren't using the
> > formula. how can you use an instrument if you
> > do not understand the feedback it is giving you.
>
> Indeed.  Since you obviously don't understand what "feedback" your
> continuity tester is giving, you clearly don't understand the
> instrument itself.  Whether you actually happen to know Ohm's law or
> not is irrelavent.
>
> BTW, I wasn't going to bother commenting at all until I noticed your
> snipe in the succeeding post.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com