Re: More VOIP/Digital Voice

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I fell asleep on the sofa watching the Bourne Identity and woke up about
3AM, after posting the message went back to sleep and just got up a minute
ago.

So I guess the answer is yes a lot

"alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Syveh.16967$Zb5.1403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Don't you ever sleep?
> js
>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:E-ydnW9OoZU6H-fYnZ2dnUVZ_rylnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Robert L Bass" <robertbass1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:wZqdnfCNV-7Z0efYnZ2dnUVZ_qmpnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > were talking about single kp for a
> >> > remote partition. [try to keep up]
> >>
> >> You're just being argumentative.  We both know you're wrong.  You tried
> >> to
> > compare a Caddx unit favorably to a far superior Napco
> >> system.  That won't work no matter how you pretend not to understand
what
> > I said.
> >
> > Not really, going by the pricing on your store
> >
> > Caddx NX-8e 192-Zone fastpack with NX-148e alpha keypad $213 + NX2216E
> > 16-Zone expander for $64, total = $277
> >
> > Napco 9600 96-Zone panel $234 + RPiCAe2 alpha keypad with 4-zone
expander
> > =
> > $108, total $312
> >
> > The Caddx panel is cheaper
> > Double the zones (192 to 96)
> > Far easier to keypad program
> > Has better download software
> > More choices in expansion modules
> > Can connect more keypads (32 to 15)
> > More choices in keypad models (You don't have to worry about mixing RP
and
> > K
> > with Caddx)
> > More than double the output current capability (2A compared to 750ma)
> > Better Contact ID/SIA reporting capability
> >
> >
>
>