Re: ADT Security Canada

["Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

Robert L Bass wrote:
> >>
> > Except every other country and our previous administration
> > all believed it too.
>
> Perhaps you may have forgotten but during the months leading up
> to the Bush War most of our former allies refused to accept the
> Bush lies.  Numerous folks who post here ridiculed France,
> Germany, Russia and Belgium for refusing to join Bush in his
> jihad.

Perhaps you may have forgotten that there were approx 14 brave nations
that in fact did have the guts to take a stand against the source of
terrorism. But leave it to you to side with the cowards.

>
> The UN said we should wait and allow the inspectors to finish
> their job.  The security council refused to endorse the attack
> despite significant bullying by Bush.

You forget again that Saddam wouldn't LET the inspectors DO their job,
thus leaving the door wide open that he had something to hide. How
stupid is that? Oh, that's right ...... just as stupid as you.

>
> Many Americans, including myself, were lead to believe there
> really were WMDs in Iraq.  The Bush lies were effective at that.
> Even among those of us who find Bush an abominable, incompetent
> jackass gave at least some credence to his lies.

So you along with all your other whimp ass librals think that if you
call something a lie long enough, it will eventually become that. You
know damn well that there was overwhelming evidence from multiple
domestic and foriegn sources that indicated there was an amassing of
WMD's. You call that a lie. Well, that alone says all there is to say
about you. If there's any deceit being defined here, you are a perfect
example of it.


>
> > If you say something that isn't true, but at the time
> > you say it you believe it is...  Is it a lie?  Or were you
> > simply wrong?
>
> Presumably, the "you" above is general and you are actually
> referring to Bush.  If that is the case, you predicate the
> question on another lie -- that he believed any of the Bushit he
> and his cronies handed the American people to justify his war.

And of course your "presumption" that he was lying has to be true, but
everyone eles "presumption" that he wasn't ..... isn't true. Or, of
course, YOU'VE got some special inside information that can prove that
YOU aren't lying. You don't have a fucking clue ..... WHAT went on, and
anything that you say is mear speculation. As usual, you lie by
inference.


>
> > As Bill Clinton once said, "attacks never fed a hungry child"
>
> Yesterday Laura Bush spoke to the media.  She expressed concern
> over getting the children back in school.  Twice she mentioned
> the cause of the problem -- hurricane *Karina* (sic)
>

Hmmmm, I guess she was lying about being concerned then ..... right?


You're a lying, theiving, sniviling coward, Fat Ass. You're a traitor
to the country that protects you so that you can continue to be a fat,
arrogant, pig slob.