[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: ADT Security Canada
>> Attacking Iraq, much as it seemed like a military romp
>> when the Bush lies were first being spread, was clearly
>> the wrong thing to do. There were no weapons of
>> mass destruction.
>
> But who knew that at the time?
George "dubya" Bush, the CIA and the UN inspectors for starters.
>> Bin Laden was not hiding in Baghdad
>
> No one ever said he was.
There were allegations that he was working with Saddam. There
also were claims that he had training camps in Iraq.
>> (he hates Hussein almost as much as he hates Bush).
>
> No one ever said that Hussein had anything to do with 9/11.
The Republicans repeatedly held up Saddam's supposed WMD campaign
as a terrorist threat to the US, claiming he would sell nuclear
and/or biological weapons to OBL.
>> Iraq was not preparing to attack us or anyone else.
>
> Never claimed...
That was the core reason (well it was what they pretended was the
reason) for attacking them in the first place.
>> There were no terrorist training camps in Iraq.
>
> As I remember (and I am getting old - perhaps you can
> point me towards the source from that time period which
> proves me wrong) the claim was that there was
> communcation between Hussein's intelligence folks and Al
> Queda.
The claim was that there was collusion between Saddam's and
Osama's intelligence forces. Others said there were terrorist
camps in Iraq.
>> All the lies Bush told have come out and the Republicans
>> *still* insist that it was a good idea to attack. What idiots!
No answer for that one, eh?
--
Regards,
Robert L Bass
Bass Burglar Alarms
The Online DIY Store
http://www.BassBurglarAlarms.com
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home