Re: Opinions on alarms systems configured/monitored over IP network

["Aegis" <lordaegis@xxxxxxxxx>]

"J. Sloud" <jsloud2001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p05641t5600cf5e70pem6lgu3c72b18qv3@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:16:59 -0500, Pat Coghlan <info@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>Dual-ported drives gives you hot-standby capability, but you still need
>>one server to take over as the active.  Summit eNT supports both
>>hot-standby and warm-standby.  In the case of the latter, the backup
>>server takes over with a view of the system going back to the last
>>checkpoint - typically some point in the early a.m.
>>
>>The AMAG website didn't really impress me, but Hirsch and Lenel
>>definitely seem to be contenders.  I guess I'll request some brochures.
>>
>
> Also, compare the capabilities of the above to Picture Perfect, which
> is what I consider the becnhmark for access control apps:
>
> http://www.geindustrial.com/ge-interlogix/products/access/picture_perfect.html

We've got alot of those out there. Dunno if I'd say benchmark. I'm not that
impressed with PP. (and I hate Linux!)