Re: Opinions on alarms systems configured/monitored over IP network

["Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

If cost and profit is not an issue....I agree. Look into AMAG, and you'll
see the marriage.
I do like Lenel though.
As well as MDI.
AMAG and DMP have the best interface that I've seen out there, and
especially for what you described. I understand your need to connect down to
the programming level, but most of what you'll find will only interface
through input/output information back to a Central location. When you choose
an Enterprise solution, there are some limitations not so much for
burg/access, but also when you get into fire. Few Enterprise solutions are
listed for fire, and I'm not just talking monitoring it, that's a whole
other issue, but the actual devices, installation.

http://www.amag.com/Products_Node_View.asp?id=58


"Pat Coghlan" <info@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%S%%d.6543$JK1.405300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The DMP system looks more suited to monitoring multiple clients, versus
> the hardware associated with a single enterprise.
>
> The Lenel product seems to be more in line with this requirement.
>
> Others?
>
> Jackcsg wrote:
> > DMP does all of that. UL Fire/Burg/Access. Remote Admin functions
directly
> > through RemoteLink (Free) Dealer Software. Alarm Monitoring Module(s)
> > (add-on) for monitoring from 1 to 5,000 accounts, with or without a
> > receiver. From 1 to 10,000 users per site, 16 doors per panel, 1 to 574
> > inputs, 505 outputs, Admin readers, and any Wiegand card format from 17
to
> > 37 bit. Windows Based. Everything a user can do, you can do remotely, as
> > well as programming. Alarms transmitted in 70 to 90 mille-seconds, UL
"AA"
> > supervision, and even AES encryption. If you have any specific
> > questions....let me know. Be glad to answer them.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > "Pat Coghlan" <info@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:48V%d.6968$nK.652952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >>I'm talking about having an appliation running on a (preferably Windows)
> >>workstation at a central station which administers a system capable of
> >>providing access control (card reader/PINpad) and intrusion detection
> >>functions.
> >>
> >>The central station should be able to:
> >>
> >>- receive active alarms
> >>- configure alarm inputs/relays/zones
> >>- administer cardholders
> >>
> >>Summit eNT does all of this, but what about other systems?
> >>
> >>-Pat
> >>
> >>Jackcsg wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>What do you have for existing control panels? Or is this for something
> >
> > new,
> >
> >>>or a combination of both? Are you talking for internal monitoring,
> >
> > remotely,
> >
> >>>or both. There are a few options available, some more affordable than
> >>>others.
> >>>
> >>>Jack
> >>>
> >>>"Pat Coghlan" <info@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>>news:u8E%d.2591$nK.422856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I'm looking for opinions on commercial alarm systems that enable alarm
> >>>>panels to be configured and monitored over an IP network - requiring
> >>>>little or no keypad programming at all.
> >>>>
> >>>>I am familiar only with the Summit eNT system by Edwards (formerly
> >>>>Integrated  Security Solutions), which does both alarm and access
> >>>>control and allows the panels to be configured from the central site -
a
> >>>>hard requirement for me.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks in advance.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >