[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: d-day

Subject: Re: d-day
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 01:41:18 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <476ab8f0.191565812@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <pan.2007.12.22.03.58.56.878245@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p7jqm3hele2sj8qdff4a2h70brs1j1m88l@xxxxxxx> <3eednfnxoeEIHvDanZ2dnUVZ_rGrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx> <hTobj.1595$XW3.550@trnddc04> <jZqdnU_LUve9F_PanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx> <fkmcoq$nc8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <476ee87c.465882109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fkmre9$psp$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <476f9fc3.512800828@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fkoaa4$iki$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

David Cunningham, who has a track record in lighting innovation, has filed a
patent on a high efficiency incandescent bulb which uses an interior coating
to block IR. The IR stays within the bulb where it heats the filament, thus
increasing the efficiency. I haven't seen definitive data but have seen
speculation from knowledgeable folks who think it may be more efficient than
CFLs.

"Ghost" <ghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>I don't agree that incandescents ever be good as CFL (just physics laws).

http://davehouston.net  http://davehouston.org
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/roZetta/
roZetta-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: d-day
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: d-day
  - From: Ghost

References:
- d-day
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: d-day
  - From: Charles Sullivan
- Re: d-day
  - From: Marc_F_Hult
- Re: d-day
  - From: John J. Bengii
- Re: d-day
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: d-day
  - From: John J. Bengii
- Re: d-day
  - From: Ghost
- Re: d-day
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: d-day
  - From: Ghost
- Re: d-day
  - From: Dave Houston
- Re: d-day
  - From: Ghost

Prev by Message: DVR CARD HUPERLAB 2408Q VS. GEOVISION GV-2004
Next by Message: Re: d-day
Previous by thread: Re: d-day
Next by thread: Re: d-day
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home