Re: d-day

["Ghost" <ghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

22% sounds optimistic, but there is no doubt CFL is the future (actualy
present in almost all EU).

Uzytkownik "Dave Houston" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisal w wiadomosci
news:476ee87c.465882109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Nobody has said that incandescent bulbs are efficient enough although some
> people try to distort what I've written in order to make it appear that
> way.
> All I have said is that the claims that switching 100% to CFLs will result
> in a 22% or greater reduction in USA electricity use (or even in the 12%,
> which is what percentage Texas uses, in the article cited at the beginning
> of the thread) are wildly exagerated. In the past I've cited Department of
> Energy statistics that support my contention that the real savings will be
> much, much less. We need to be doing far, far more.
>
> "Ghost" <ghost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Maybe my english is too bad for understand people here - but do you think
>>that old "warm" bulbs are effective enough? In Europe nobody think that -
>>maybe because cost of electricity is far, far higher.
>
>
> http://davehouston.net  http://davehouston.org
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/roZetta/
> roZetta-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx