Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites

[nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 17, 9:22=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 4:50=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 17, 3:22=A0pm, Frank Kurz <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > On 17/01/2011 11:32 AM, Doug wrote:
>
> > > > "Jim"<alarmi...@xxxxxxx> =A0wrote in message
> > > >news:69cc83f8-8be0-440d-9f29-a18c5033156d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
m...
> > > > On Jan 17, 10:31 am, "Doug"<d...@xxxxxxx> =A0wrote:
>
> > > >> And there you have it.
>
> > > >> Down the slippery slope.
>
> > > >> The next step is to require that all drinkable liquid containers m=
ust
> > > >> have an unremoveable plastic nipple.
>
> > > > Hmm, I think I might be in favour of that idea, how realistic do yo=
u think
> > > > the nipple will be?
>
> > > > Doug
>
> > > Jim's obsessions with "nipples" and "slippery slopes" are legendary.
> > > And you're asking how realistic it will be?!? =A0:-)
>
> > I can see sprinklers in trailers before homes. any day have put enough
> > trailer fires out and nothing was left.
> > and a trailer could be done cheap and easy compared to a home.-
>
> Now come *** ON **** Nick!
>
> Can' you see that this thread has morphed into something that's
> *****"REALLY"***** interesting and you're still talking about
> sprinkler systems. =A0Jeeeeeeze!

OK Here you go
http://www.wpxi.com/news/26518102/detail.html

People should not be allowed to jack up there own vehicles and have to
get a professional to prevent these types of problems.