[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites

Subject: Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
From: "Doug" <doug@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:32:04 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <f559a55b-8d96-4701-8973-f3fcf0999868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ih1lei$621$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <WhZYo.50034$My1.37808@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <69cc83f8-8be0-440d-9f29-a18c5033156d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:69cc83f8-8be0-440d-9f29-a18c5033156d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 17, 10:31 am, "Doug" <d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>And there you have it.

>Down the slippery slope.

>The next step is to require that all drinkable liquid containers must
>have an unremoveable plastic nipple.

Hmm, I think I might be in favour of that idea, how realistic do you think
the nipple will be?

Doug

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
  - From: Frank Kurz

References:
- Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
  - From: petem001
- Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
  - From: Doug
- Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: Re: Automatic fire sprinklers
Next by Message: Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
Previous by thread: Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
Next by thread: Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home