Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jan 17, 4:50=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 3:22=A0pm, Frank Kurz <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17/01/2011 11:32 AM, Doug wrote:
>
> > > "Jim"<alarmi...@xxxxxxx> =A0wrote in message
> > >news:69cc83f8-8be0-440d-9f29-a18c5033156d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
..
> > > On Jan 17, 10:31 am, "Doug"<d...@xxxxxxx> =A0wrote:
>
> > >> And there you have it.
>
> > >> Down the slippery slope.
>
> > >> The next step is to require that all drinkable liquid containers mus=
t
> > >> have an unremoveable plastic nipple.
>
> > > Hmm, I think I might be in favour of that idea, how realistic do you =
think
> > > the nipple will be?
>
> > > Doug
>
> > Jim's obsessions with "nipples" and "slippery slopes" are legendary.
> > And you're asking how realistic it will be?!? =A0:-)
>
> I can see sprinklers in trailers before homes. any day have put enough
> trailer fires out and nothing was left.
> and a trailer could be done cheap and easy compared to a home.-

Now come *** ON **** Nick!

Can' you see that this thread has morphed into something that's
*****"REALLY"***** interesting and you're still talking about
sprinkler systems.  Jeeeeeeze!