Re: Another example of Sprinkler hypocrites

[nick markowitz <nmarkowitz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 17, 3:22=A0pm, Frank Kurz <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/01/2011 11:32 AM, Doug wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Jim"<alarmi...@xxxxxxx> =A0wrote in message
> >news:69cc83f8-8be0-440d-9f29-a18c5033156d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > On Jan 17, 10:31 am, "Doug"<d...@xxxxxxx> =A0wrote:
>
> >> And there you have it.
>
> >> Down the slippery slope.
>
> >> The next step is to require that all drinkable liquid containers must
> >> have an unremoveable plastic nipple.
>
> > Hmm, I think I might be in favour of that idea, how realistic do you th=
ink
> > the nipple will be?
>
> > Doug
>
> Jim's obsessions with "nipples" and "slippery slopes" are legendary.
> And you're asking how realistic it will be?!? =A0:-)

I can see sprinklers in trailers before homes. any day have put enough
trailer fires out and nothing was left.
and a trailer could be done cheap and easy compared to a home.