[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monitoring Rates

Subject: Re: Monitoring Rates
From: "George Siegle" <gsiegle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:59:13 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ZoLwj.8954$ZQ2.2692@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <XyNwj.1269$pM4.142@pd7urf1no> <9bWwj.9482$ZQ2.1922@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c4345c$0$10296$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yVWwj.9657$ZQ2.7206@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c43f91$0$514$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <35_wj.20526$497.1107@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c498eb$0$6159$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Moose panel....

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47c498eb$0$6159$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "bit eimer" <bit_eimer.keinewurst@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:35_wj.20526$497.1107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Crash:
>>
>> Am considering the following as a startup system:
>> Vista-20P panel
>> 6160RF keypad
>>
>> Future upgrades possible:
>> - up to 10 2-wire smokes (2W-B or 528BXT?)
>> - 7845i-GSM
>> - 2x keyfobs; 5804E?
>> - 7x rf GBD; 5853?
>> - CO sensor; suggestions??
>> - rf motion sensors; 5890PI
>> - 3x rf flood sensors; suggestions??
>>
>> So, is this type of equipment generally acceptable (assuming correct
>> installation)?
>
> Dump that and put in an AT&T 8000, best damn panel ever made
>
>

References:
- Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: Bass Burglar Alarms - Sitemap Page 8 of 474
Next by Message: Re: Monitoring Rates
Previous by thread: Re: Monitoring Rates
Next by thread: Re: Monitoring Rates
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home