[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monitoring Rates

Subject: Re: Monitoring Rates
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:54:04 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ZoLwj.8954$ZQ2.2692@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <XyNwj.1269$pM4.142@pd7urf1no> <9bWwj.9482$ZQ2.1922@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c4345c$0$10296$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yVWwj.9657$ZQ2.7206@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c43f91$0$514$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <35_wj.20526$497.1107@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

"bit eimer" <bit_eimer.keinewurst@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:35_wj.20526$497.1107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Crash:
>
> Am considering the following as a startup system:
> Vista-20P panel
> 6160RF keypad
>
> Future upgrades possible:
> - up to 10 2-wire smokes (2W-B or 528BXT?)
> - 7845i-GSM
> - 2x keyfobs; 5804E?
> - 7x rf GBD; 5853?
> - CO sensor; suggestions??
> - rf motion sensors; 5890PI
> - 3x rf flood sensors; suggestions??
>
> So, is this type of equipment generally acceptable (assuming correct
> installation)?

Dump that and put in an AT&T 8000, best damn panel ever made

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: alarman
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: George Siegle

References:
- Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer

Prev by Message: Re: DVR Recommendations
Next by Message: Re: A Canadian Invention
Previous by thread: Re: Monitoring Rates
Next by thread: Re: Monitoring Rates
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home