[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monitoring Rates

Subject: Re: Monitoring Rates
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:54:12 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ZoLwj.8954$ZQ2.2692@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <XyNwj.1269$pM4.142@pd7urf1no> <9bWwj.9482$ZQ2.1922@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c4345c$0$10296$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yVWwj.9657$ZQ2.7206@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c43f91$0$514$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <35_wj.20526$497.1107@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c4a4de$0$3566$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2aae54aee2ffcf5d60289f7843ba71b3np@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <tX1xj.20819$497.8938@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47c4aeea$0$30712$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47c4aeea$0$30712$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Are there "issues" with the 20P?
> Yes, it is made by Ademco (now Honeywell).
> That is why there is the:
> Vista 20
> Vista 20HW
> Vista 20HWSE
> Vista 20P
> Vista 20PS
> Vista 20PSIA
> Vista 20SE
> Instead of just the Vista 20.
> For the Vista 20P there is:
> Vista 20P-1
> Vista 20P-2
> Vista 20P-3
> Vista 20P-5(IP)

The only current panel from that group is the 20P v5

References:
- Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: G . Morgan
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: bit eimer
- Re: Monitoring Rates
  - From: Just Looking

Prev by Message: Re: Non mains system
Next by Message: Re: EST Quick Start
Previous by thread: Re: Monitoring Rates
Next by thread: Re: Monitoring Rates
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home