Re: hello

["alarman" <thatsallfolksl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Leuck wrote:
> "alarman" <thatsallfolksl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:d520j.82$wo.16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
>>> while i wont refute nor confirum what you say of mr. bass (i dont
>>> know anything about him yet, therefore who am i to pass judgement?)
>>> i feel that laying everything at his feet is irresponsible.  its
>>> evident
>>> that this group is a vast resource for alarm information.  its also
>>> obvious however, that _some_ go out of their way just to be jerks.
>>> this is why i prefer to simply learn when i can, teach when i can,
>>> and avoid the petty bickering as much as possible.  i could argue
>>> back and forth with those i find to be jerks, but i find it much
>>> easier to simply avoid their posts.
>>> thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts.
>>
>> Let me see if I get this: You will not pass judgement on "Mr. Bass",
>> but you judge me irresponsible without any knowledge of the history
>> of this group. Is that about it?
>> js
>
> I think he called you a jerk

Tsk! I'm crushed.

--
js

- The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
( Also, the harder they bite, punch, and kick.)