Re: hello

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"alarman" <thatsallfolksl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d520j.82$wo.16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> > while i wont refute nor confirum what you say of mr. bass (i dont know
> > anything about him yet, therefore who am i to pass judgement?) i feel
> > that laying everything at his feet is irresponsible.  its evident
> > that this group is a vast resource for alarm information.  its also
> > obvious however, that _some_ go out of their way just to be jerks. this
is
> > why i prefer to simply learn when i can, teach when i can,
> > and avoid the petty bickering as much as possible.  i could argue
> > back and forth with those i find to be jerks, but i find it much
> > easier to simply avoid their posts.
> > thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts.
>
> Let me see if I get this: You will not pass judgement on "Mr. Bass", but
you
> judge me irresponsible without any knowledge of the history of this group.
> Is that about it?
> js

I think he called you a jerk