Re: 2 or 4 wire smoke detector question.

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok i am fine with the fact that he was mad because he tried to kill his
father..

but do you send young American dying because of that?

No you send a team of expert go killing the ass hole,even if its illegal,at
least you make it clean,you can get caught doing it,but at most its a few
life,not thousand,and you dont lie to your poeple to cover lie on
lie...etc...

I am not angry,if its what you sens in my post,well i am sorry about it,i am
just plain discusted..
i find it very hard to see all those killing for notting..on both side
,every lost is one to much..



"Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
46a978aa$0$32610$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Maybe Bush was mad because Saddam tried to finish off his papa. That even
> got Clinton's dander up enough to send a few missiles over there to
> depreciate the value of some Iraqi real estate. You sound angry enough
> Pete, but just not cynical enough. You need to read 1984, or read it
> again. The reason the G8 countries didn't want Bush to kick Saddam's ass
> was they were corrupted by Saddam's oil for food program. They didn't care
> what happened to Saddam or Iraq.  Money talks and BS walks.
>
> "Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:tneqi.7340$dp3.173497@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> What the rest of the world see right now, is that Bush Lied,that's
>> it,don't need to wait till historian finish playing with there ass to
>> know that..
>>
>> btw most G8 country told USA not to go to war with Iraq under the reason
>> he was pulling off...
>>
>> Just look about Afghanistan,there was no problem there..every one knew
>> that the taliban there,were a treat for all the occidental country..
>> why on earth would they have acted differently if there would have been
>> the case for Iraq..
>>
>> Bush wanted to finish the man off,his father thought that leaving the
>> country in a very bad situation for a long time ,the people from Iraq
>> would get rid of there president,too bad it didn't happen...so he had to
>> finish papa's job..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
>> 46a8d640$0$30674$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> What put the bug up Bush's ass to flatten Saddam will be debated by
>>> future
>>> historians for some time I suspect. To over simplify it all and say Bush
>>> lied about Saddam's capability and intentions is hardly an answer,
>>> especially if you don't mention all the other leading Democrats as well
>>> as
>>> Republicans that said the very same thing. Most of the G8 nation's
>>> intelligence departments said the same thing as well. I don't think Bush
>>> held sway over any of them. The CIA's leaks about undue political
>>> pressure
>>> in reaching that Saddam is a menace conclusion was shown to be a CYA
>>> effort
>>> so they wouldn't have to fall on their sword for such a screw up. Bottom
>>> line is the CIA missed the threats that hit us, and so far seemed to
>>> have
>>> guessed wrong about Iraq.  Historically the U.S. has never been a
>>> country
>>> that enjoyed long protracted wars, so it's no surprise that the Iraq
>>> situation is so unpopular. The rest of the world never likes to see the
>>> U.S.
>>> go out to kick ass and take names, unless their the one nation being
>>> protected. So the experiment goes on to see whether or not the Iraqi's
>>> can
>>> take back control of the country from the legacy of a brutal dictator.
>>>
>>> "Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:EM3qi.2209$dp3.92865@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> thanks for the answer..but clearly its not what most people in the US
>>>> and
>>>> the rest of the world were thinking when W spoke about the BIG amount
>>> Saddam
>>>> had...what he could do with it and why the world had to fight this evil
>>>> man...
>>>>
>>>> what it the most disturbing,is the lie,plain lie,or maybe we should say
>>> lack
>>>> of full information,they maybe knew they would find a small amount of
>>> shell
>>>> or stuff like that in the country,after all like you said,there is
>>>> stuff
>>>> lying around in Europe after 50 + after the war...and it would not
>>> surprise
>>>> me that even the US military don't know the full amount of all the ammo
>>> they
>>>> have,in Iraq or even in the US..
>>>>
>>>> why I pointed to W when this post thread started its because we are
>>>> just
>>>> beginning to see how W used the US citizen,how he used 911 to go to war
>>> with
>>>> a country that was not a real treat but was more a strategic place to
>>>> hold...that would not have made the point and most US citizen would not
>>> have
>>>> loved it..it would not have pass congress or the senate..
>>>>
>>>> But one other thing...what about the kool aid stuff...here we don't
>>>> drink
>>>> that,we drink beer,the real stuff,not like your stuff,but I can see a
>>>> possible comparison between our beers and cool aid..here we drink beer
>>>> and
>>>> south of our border they serve kool aid in bar....;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>>> 46a7a1ca$0$4695$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> > You asked the question. I provided an answer. Consider the potency of
>>>> > agents
>>>> > like sarin versus the actual amount of the substance you have to have
>>>> > on
>>>> > hand to create an effective weapon. Taking into account the long
>>>> > build
>>> up
>>>> > to
>>>> > the beginning of military action, Saddam would have to have been an
>>>> > exceptionally ignorant person to get caught with any WMD smoking gun.
>>> What
>>>> > he did get caught with is the stuff he actually forgot about keeping
>>> track
>>>> > of himself. That to me a is a bit more worrying (and the fact the
>>>> > U.S.
>>>> > kept
>>>> > it secret so long after finding it). To be able to have so much of
>>>> > not
>>>> > only
>>>> > conventional weapons, but banned weapons as well, to say "Oh yes, I
>>> forgot
>>>> > about those 500 shells". In short, there is no real way to say what
>>> Saddam
>>>> > had or didn't have in the way of WMD. Like they say, absence of
>>>> > evidence
>>>> > is
>>>> > not evidence of absence. Nothing we read now is likely to tell much
>>>> > of
>>> the
>>>> > truth about anything. I think in 20 or 30 years we will all be
>>>> > surprised
>>>> > about what really went on when it is presented on the History
>>>> > Channel.
>>> One
>>>> > thing is for certain, there is no sarin in Kool Aid. You'd be long
>>>> > gone
>>> if
>>>> > there were.
>>>> >
>>>> > After any conflict there is clean up on the battlefield. The
>>>> > Europeans
>>> are
>>>> > still cleaning up stuff from WWI and WWII. I am sure the Iraqis will
>>>> > be
>>>> > doing the same with depleted Uranium and other munitions.
>>>> >
>>>> > "Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> > news:YkLpi.43551$i07.297831@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >> Yes they found over 500.
>>>> >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
>>>> >> >>> Just one question,after 911 did he had WMD?
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> please show them to the world if you know where they are..till
>>>> > then....
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> wow 500 degraded sarin and mustard gas munition...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> DEGRADED...been more ten years they were build,and the degrade
>>>> >> fast...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> not even good enough to use a  trap...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> compared to the thousand of depleted uranium shell you trew at them
>>>> >> its
>>>> > like
>>>> >> they could have hurt you with a stone....
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'am impress !!!
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>