[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Takeover standards

Subject: Re: Takeover standards
From: "Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:13:25 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1187198686.735562.181540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7hRwi.61214$_d2.6527@pd7urf3no> <1187269366.739809.291150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4G5xi.63020$_d2.60869@pd7urf3no> <1187316029.517955.41340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> RHC: Now you seem to be contradicting yourself Frank. I got the
> distinct impression from your last post that you felt your company was
> above all that. Now you tell me that your company does take over
> "nightmare systems" and messed up professional systems. I'm not trying
> to be argumentative, but which is it ? And more to the point, why
> would you even touch these problem systems ?

He just makes it up as he goes alaong.
It's like the inverted airliner BS story.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Jim
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- Takeover standards
  - From: tourman
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: tourman
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Takeover standards
  - From: tourman

Prev by Message: Re: Takeover standards
Next by Message: The best security＆protection products manufacture in China
Previous by thread: Re: Takeover standards
Next by thread: Re: Takeover standards
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home