Re: New house system recomendation

["Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

Mark Leuck wrote:
> "secure15" <secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:hFdMg.642$344.322@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Mark Leuck wrote:
> > > "secure15" <secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:4BTLg.116$8t.89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Mark Leuck wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> No, its because the act of programming it is far more cumbersome than
> > > any
> > >>> other panel manufacturer
> > >> I suppose you've never tried Ademco, OR you're just not proficient in
> > >> programming Napco products.
> > >
> > >
> > > I've programmed about every panel made within the last 15 years from
> just
> > > about every manufacturer. I programmed countless Napco 1000/1008/1016,
> XP
> > > and GEM systems out in the field. Napco has ALWAYS been more difficult
> to
> > > program or even explain programming to someone else.
> > >
> > > My primary panel of choice these days is Ademco and GE
> > >
> > >
> > Again, apparently you're not that proficient: I have NO Problem or
> > difficulty with ANY Napco programming- Ademco IS confusing! For the Last
> > 20 years! GE to me seems to be in between the 2.
>
> I am quite proficient thank you, again all I can tell you is they are the
> most difficult to program and the most difficult to explain to others how to
> program. The damn things come with 3 manuals for crying out loud. Look at
> Napco's market share and you'll see most other companies feel the same way
>

Actually Napco is the third most popular panel nationwide, accoding to
a pole taken by one of the trades a year or so ago.

> GE is by far the easiest and Ademco is a close second