[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: New house system recomendation

Subject: Re: New house system recomendation
From: secure15 <secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:42:57 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1157225765.645027.67780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VipKg.6765$DB3.4967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Md-dnf9a4O6M22fZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <JoyKg.4410$y61.3154@fed1read05> <1157296417.508647.270350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0yCKg.14006$Qf.3246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1157564831.128191.177820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <tMSdnflIQad3HGLZnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Mark Leuck wrote:

> No, its because the act of programming it is far more cumbersome than any
> other panel manufacturer

I suppose you've never tried Ademco, OR you're just not proficient in
programming Napco products.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- New house system recomendation
  - From: jollyroger
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Micky Savage
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Rich
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: alarman
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: jollyroger
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Russell Brill
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Jim
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Vista PowerDome CCTV
Next by Message: Re: Is low-priced Internet monitoring reliable?
Previous by thread: Re: New house system recomendation
Next by thread: Re: New house system recomendation
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home