[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: New house system recomendation

Subject: Re: New house system recomendation
From: "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>
Date: 6 Sep 2006 10:47:11 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1157225765.645027.67780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VipKg.6765$DB3.4967@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Md-dnf9a4O6M22fZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <JoyKg.4410$y61.3154@fed1read05> <1157296417.508647.270350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0yCKg.14006$Qf.3246@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Russell Brill wrote:
> >
> Modern equivalent (when comparing Quality) to Moose Z1100 = Napco P3200
> w/K1CA keypad... But, it's not easy to program and not quite as flexible as
> some of the other products available...

In my opinion .....the reason Napco is considered by others to be so
hard to program is because it's more flexible than other panels.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Russell Brill
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- New house system recomendation
  - From: jollyroger
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Micky Savage
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Rich
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: alarman
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: jollyroger
- Re: New house system recomendation
  - From: Russell Brill

Prev by Message: Re: Is low-priced Internet monitoring reliable?
Next by Message: Re: Is low-priced Internet monitoring reliable?
Previous by thread: Re: New house system recomendation
Next by thread: Re: New house system recomendation
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home