Re: Compact cheap "surveilance" camera

["alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>]

And you need to learn to be honest with yourself.
js
"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lwmjaiS+yapEFwEo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <C0CB2C41.C4F9%teflon1_@xxxxxxxxx>, teflon nonstick
> <teflon1_@xxxxxxxxx> writes
>>On 30/6/06 19:00, in article qqcA84IXbWpEFwlK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>>"Prometheus" <Prometheus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <3iapg.69$5K2.27@fed1read03>, alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Posted because alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> did not understand what he
> was advocating.
>
>>> Surveillance
>>> ? noun close observation, especially of a suspected spy or criminal.
>>>
>>> Observation
>>> ? noun 1 the action or process of closely observing or monitoring. 2
>>> the ability to notice significant details. 3 a comment based on
>>> something one has seen, heard, or noticed.
>>>
>>> monitor
>>>   ? verb keep under observation, especially so as to regulate, record,
>>> or control
>>>
>>> Maybe you do not consider the "audit trail" to be "closely ...
>>> monitoring", I do; still you are a top poster.
>>
>>Most of the content in most of the groups deteriorates to shit.
>
> Given your choice of vocabulary I conclude that long words are beyond you.
> I posted the definitions because alarman <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> did not
> understand advocating logging people who enter and exit is surveillance.
> After posting viable solutions the thread drifted, as conversations do,
> perhaps people don't talk to you, otherwise you would know this.
>
>>The bloke wanted to lock his fucking door, but this is what it ends up
>>with
>>brain damaged wankers giving English lessons.
>
> He has already been given advice, and acknowledged it; see my post
> advocating using a PIR to release the door after a lack of movement for
> fifteen minutes, turn off the lights; and even arm the alarm. The thread
> has since drifted, as you shold have learned that conversations tend to.
>
>>Get. A. Fucking. Life.
>
> After posting viable solutions the thread drifted, as conversations do; I
> can understand why people don't talk to you.
>
> Why are you so opposed to not using surveillance; knowing who left the
> door open yesterday will not prevent last nights burglary, reprimanding
> the person who left the door open in the honest belief that someone else
> was there will not stop this honest mistake being made again, it might
> drive honest fee paying members away.
>
> Your evident level of education, and your preference for spying on people
> makes me ask, are you a private security guard or perhaps a cop? Maybe
> this is why people don't talk to you.
>
> You
>     really
>            need
>                 to
>                    learn
>                          the
>                              art
>                                  of
>                                     conversation.
>
> --
> Ian             G8ILZ