Re: Paying customer wakes up to CF alarm every morning

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey cool your jets, or at least shift into a lower gear! I don't hear anyone
disagreeing that the POTS line IS the answer. But there are companies that
will try to make it work, in spite of the fact they shouldn't, either
because they don't understand the nature of the problem, or simply because
they are trying to assist their customer, or whatever...

Sheesh....

RHC

"Jen...tel" <poleclimber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1129767024.400121.33670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Any controversy is cause i call it as it is.
> The guy got an alarm.
> The alarm needs a POTS line.
> He disconnected the POTS line.
> He wants the beeping to stop.
> He's paying for their service.
> The beeping is cause theirs no POTS line.
> Brinks is trying to get it to work,.
> He won't cancel cause he wants to move with the system.
> What is the alarm techs solution?  For brinks to accept payment each
> month for monitoring but shut off the monitoring so it won't beep.
> Sounds like their solution is for the company to do something that
> isn't their procedures just cause the idiot wants his wife to blab to
> the folks back home.  Why don't he just get a POTS line for the months
> he's still at his house?  Nobody suggested that, did they?  It's all
> on the alarm company to solve the jerk's stupidity.  So he moves to his
> next home but shuts off electricity?  Now what??
> Tell me R.H. Campbell, who's not doing their part as they agreed?  If
> brinks is doing their part or trying to do their part as bets they can,
> how come nobody is telling the idiot to go get a POTS line for a month
> or so and the problem is solved?  Why should any company be made the
> bad guy in this, and not the customer?
>